Part 1 Entry: Sarah Taitz, “Five Things to Know About NSA Mass Surveillance and the Coming Fight in Congress” ACLU, April 11 2023
Part 2: Terminology and Key Terms:
Section 702
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)
Warrantless Surveillance
PRISM
Upstream
Constitutional Rights
Fourth Amendment
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)
Surveillance State
NSA (National Security Agency)
Reauthorization
Transparency Reports
Supreme Court
Bulk Surveillance
Part 3: Précis: The author discusses the impending expiration of section 702 and the reasons why it shouldn’t be renewed by congress. Section 702 has become a problem for Americans traveling internationally The National Security Agency (NSA) also gets people’s data through Upstream and PRISM. The authors accentuates the potential violation of the first amendment that being the right to privacy. The ACLU supports the removal of section 702 including restrictions on backdoor searches, reducing surveillance, and increasing transparency.
Part 4: Reflection: The article clearly leans towards restricting surveillance on Americans even if they are outside of the country. There is an emphasis on the FBI and how agents can end up going though peoples private data and target them. There are lots of concerns associated with FISA in general and this article does a great job with informing the readers.
Part 5 Quotables:
“One of the most sweeping surveillance statutes ever enacted by Congress is set to expire at the end of this year — creating an important opportunity to rein in America’s sprawling surveillance state.”
“Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act permits the U.S. government to engage in mass, warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international communications, including phone calls, texts, emails, social media messages, and web browsing.”
“The government claims to be pursuing vaguely defined foreign intelligence ‘targets,’ but its targets need not be spies, terrorists, or criminals. They can be virtually any foreigner abroad: journalists, academic researchers, scientists, or businesspeople.”
“As Congress debates the reauthorization of Section 702, it’s vital that we tell our representatives in Congress that we want an end to warrantless mass surveillance.”



