The rise of generative artificial intelligence is bound to be a pivotal point in our search for more efficient information processing. Nicholas Carr’s commentary informs my perspective on this rise by addressing concerns about devalued thinking, ethics, and education. Nicholas mentions the internet’s influence on our attention span and our ability to think deeply being extended to generative AI. This is something we notice today as we’re so used to getting our information quickly by simply searching or scrolling. As AI becomes more capable, it poses this risk of people relying on it too heavily and not engaging with it critically potentially leading to less deeper thinking with the content we interact with.
Memory machines, which are designed to help with memorizing and retrieving information, relate to my writing and literacy practices as they assist in the research, content, and structure of my work. When looking for specific information on a topic, I can utilize ChatGPT to condense information from a plethora of sources in a few paragraphs instead of reading through each source manually. In the past, I’ve used ChatGPT to peer-review my written work and ask what improvements I could make to make the paper better answer the given prompt. This has enhanced the quality and structure of some essays I have written and the feedback that I’ve gotten from AI proofreading for me has genuinely helped me since they were specific to my writing style.



